<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 29 May 2012 21:10:56 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog - Comments</title><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Marietta Property Management comments on It's true, Management IS Everything</title><author>Marietta Property Management</author><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:03:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/1/3/its-true-management-is-everything.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18211964</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The post is very interesting and useful for me.Thanks for sharing the post.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Paul Gabrail comments on President Obama - Not the best at financial planning</title><author>Paul Gabrail</author><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:23:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/5/15/president-obama-not-the-best-at-financial-planning.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18150396</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p><p>I would semi-agree and I have wondered how much more a president makes with an additional year in office but I would guess it isnt very much more. It was well known that Bush Sr was making many seven figures after his term and if you look at Carter, he was extremely successful, especially writing books, after his only term in office.</p><p>I honestly think its just a matter of him either not caring short term or just wanting to appear unbiased, which is the right thought process.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Chris comments on President Obama - Not the best at financial planning</title><author>Chris</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/5/15/president-obama-not-the-best-at-financial-planning.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18146986</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Let me say up front - I agree with you. Smart thing to do would be to pay down high interest rate debt. </p><p>But from the devil&#39;s advocate standpoint, here is an argument for the long term reward of the President holding treasuries (I know its convoluted):</p><p>1.)President Obama invests bulk of his funds in Treasury bonds (lets say $4 M)<br/>2.) Because of that investment, voters are assured by the fact that he is invested in the US<br/>3.) Because of that assurance, 300,000 new voters are swayed to vote for him<br/>4.) Because of the new voters, he wins a new state, and is elected to a second term<br/>5.) Because of his second term, he can write an additional book and charge more for speaking engagements<br/>6.) Because of the book/speaking he makes an additional $5 million compared to a one term President</p><p>So, he uses the $4 M Treasury investment to become a 2 term President, which yields him an additional $5 M. I know that no one should operate their investments by that speculative logic, but it does make for an entertaining supposition...</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Paul Gabrail comments on President Obama - Not the best at financial planning</title><author>Paul Gabrail</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/5/15/president-obama-not-the-best-at-financial-planning.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18137764</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks again for the comment.  <br/>That would be something to campaign about for him! I didn&#39;t even think of that. <br/>How is it good financial decision in the long term? I think it&#39;s the exact opposite.  It may be a good decision short term but long term, it&#39;s not.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Chris comments on If You Buy into the Facebook IPO, you are NOT very smart</title><author>Chris</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/5/8/if-you-buy-into-the-facebook-ipo-you-are-not-very-smart.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18136795</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thats true - doesn&#39;t appear that Groupon has any idea how to profit off of their revenues.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Chris comments on President Obama - Not the best at financial planning</title><author>Chris</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/5/15/president-obama-not-the-best-at-financial-planning.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18136786</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts, appreciated the link as I hadn&#39;t seen the article!</p><p>This might be a case of addition by subtraction. That is, it might make financial sense in the long term while presenting as a poor decision short term. </p><p>I would not be surprised at all to hear the President, while on the campaign trail, say: &quot;I believe so much in Americans and in the American economy, that I have invested the bulk of my assets in this country&#39;s debt.&quot; Some voters may look at that, and appreciate that his money is where his mouth is. So, if by making a seemingly poor financial decision (investing in treasuries while holding a high rate mortgage), he helps himself get elected to a second term, it could be a great financial decision. A second term may yield him more financial clout as a speaking draw, or give him additional fodder for a book. Just a little conjecture...</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Paul Gabrail comments on Premium Paid for “High Growth” Stocks</title><author>Paul Gabrail</author><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/2/23/premium-paid-for-high-growth-stocks.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18067578</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Justin.</p><p>Yeah well we will see how the IPO goes. As I tell everyone, it could surge because of demand day 1, but the prospects of justifying a price close to their IPO in the near future is going to be hard.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Justin Bennett comments on Premium Paid for “High Growth” Stocks</title><author>Justin Bennett</author><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:18:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/2/23/premium-paid-for-high-growth-stocks.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18067564</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Well said! I completely agree that while Facebook may be a great company, it isn&#39;t one I wish to buy, at least not in the form of an IPO. In fact, the news is already buzzing about a weaker than anticipated demand for their IPO, particularly from institutional investors who are very much aware of a P/E ratio, among others.</p><p>Stock Watch Index</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Paul Gabrail comments on If You Buy into the Facebook IPO, you are NOT very smart</title><author>Paul Gabrail</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/5/8/if-you-buy-into-the-facebook-ipo-you-are-not-very-smart.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18056452</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris! Yeah those sales numbers are crazy.</p><p>I do think this is better than Groupon tho bc at least FB makes money!</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Chris comments on If You Buy into the Facebook IPO, you are NOT very smart</title><author>Chris</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:49:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thecapitalistmanifesto.com/blog/2012/5/8/if-you-buy-into-the-facebook-ipo-you-are-not-very-smart.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1131666:13167476:comment/18056366</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Agreed - this makes the overpriced offerings of Zynga, Groupon and Linkedin look good.  The price to sales ratio is extremely scary. With a valuation of $90 B Facebook has a PSR of 23.7 (ttm). By comparison, Linkedin (in my opinion one of the most overvalued internet stocks) has a PSR of 18.6. Google, Groupon and Zynga all have a PSR around 5, and Amazons is closer to 2. I think I&#39;ll stick with the small cap, value stocks. </p><p>Thanks for the article!</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>
